What do evaluation practices reveal about the evolving career and working life of the public engagement professional?: An exploration of government-funded research centres in Ireland.

Author: Sylvia Leatham – Dublin City University, Ireland

The Irish government is investing millions of euro in scientific research, in an effort to boost Ireland’s economic competitiveness. Alongside research obligations, institutions and researchers funded by the State are obliged to carry out public engagement activities. There are growing expectations that these outreach activities be evaluated – that is, measured in some way for impact or effectiveness. However, much evaluation activity is ‘hidden’ in unpublished reports to funders, and scholarly publications on evaluation are few and far between in Ireland.

Both the academic arena and the field of practice in public engagement suffer from a lack of agreed standards around evaluation: There are no generally agreed measures of efficacy, definitions of success, or even, at times, definitions of terminology.

An examination of the evaluation practices of publicly funded scientific research centres in Ireland – carried out during a master’s in Science Communication at Dublin City University – aimed to identify current practices, establish common themes and highlight ‘pain points’. A qualitative approach was used to thematically analyse the knowledge, behaviour and experiences of public engagement professionals employed by Science Foundation Ireland Research Centres. These Education and Public Engagement managers are responsible for the coordination, delivery and evaluation of outreach programmes on behalf of their research centres.

Analysis of ten semi-structured interviews resulted in six themes:

• Lack of resources

• Knowledge, expertise and training

• Qualitative data and evaluation as research

• Isolated autonomy and the desire to collaborate

• Approaches, methods and challenges

• Attitude and motivation

This study yields a partial insight into the working life of a public engagement manager in a third-level institute, combined with findings around evaluation practices, attitudes and behaviour in SFI Research Centres. Recommendations are presented for consideration by those interested in enhancing the evaluation skills, capacity and support for research centres and their public engagement managers.

The author has not yet submitted a copy of the full paper.

Presentation type: Individual paper
Theme: Transformation

Categories: 2021 PCST Conference (virtual)
Tags: Leatham S

Contact

The Network for the Public Communication of Science and Technology (PCST Network) is an organisation that promotes discussion on the theory and practice of communicating science, and of public discourses about science and technology and their role in society.

Email: admin@pcst.network
Web: www.pcst.network

Incorporated in the Australian Capital Territory, Australia. Registered number AO5352.

Connect

PCST is the an active and influential international academic and professional organisation in the field of science communication.

Become a member

Our email discussion list is free for everyone to join and has an international audience of over 2000 subscribers.

Join the discussion list

PCST Network has co-operation agreements with the following international organisations:

EUSEA
European Science Engagement Association

IECA
International Environmental Communication Association

RedPOP
Latin American and Caribbean Network for the Popularisation of Science and Technology