Author: Adam Oliver Brown – Dept. of Biology (Faculty of Science) and Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa, Canada

Co-authors:

  • Chantal Barriault – Science Communication Graduate Program, Laurentian University, Canada
  • Erin MacIsaac – Science Communication Graduate Program, Laurentian University
  • Sydney Smith – Dept. of Biology, University of Ottawa, Canada

The landscape for the Public Communication of Science (PCS) is rapidly developing in Canada, wherein it is seen as becoming increasingly important for scientists to communicate directly to the general public and to attempt to make their scientific knowledge accessible for informed decision-making by non-scientific citizens in society. Scholars of science communication note, however, that there are numerous, marked differences in the approaches and skills required for the effective communication of science between scientific and non-scientific audiences, as well as the unique challenges associated with communicating science across a number of media platforms. Furthermore, it is commonly recognized that undergraduate students of science do not receive much (if any) training for PCS skill development from traditional university programs in the natural sciences, despite the importance placed on science outreach from science professors, departments and universities. In order to assess the nature of the PCS skill-development offered to undergraduate students of science in Canada, we performed a nation-wide study to determine where and how these skills were being taught. We compared the reported learning outcomes offered on the websites of programs in natural science departments from all universities across Canada, as well as an analysis of directed surveys to all Faculties and Departments offering undergraduate programs inquiring about the nature and extent of PCS content in their programs. Using follow-up surveys, we directly polled professors involved in PCS curriculum offerings to give us more information about the nature and content of these activities. From these results it has been shown that professional attitudes towards PCS in Canadian academia are favourable and encouraging but that there is often a gap in the availability of curriculum that actively addresses learning of PCS skills among their programs. This study highlights the importance of curriculum development for PCS pedagogy in undergraduate science programs across Canada.

The author has not yet submitted a copy of the full paper.

Presentation type: Individual paper
Theme: Transformation

Author: Autumn Brown – Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland

Reshaping the global culture of science through a pleasure-based pursuit of knowledge.

Science is often contrasted with arts and humanities as an endeavour of utility. We study and we memorise scientific methods and phenomena because we have to, or because these concepts are useful. But how might the way we communicate science be changed if we re-conceptualise the pursuit of scientific understanding as pleasurable. The intensity of illumination, or revelation will never be replaced by a facile delivery of impersonal scientific concepts. If we as science communicators are to be effective, it is imperative that our practice be not only elucidating but include an element of enchantment.

Informed in part by the works of Maria Popova, and the theoretical perspectives of Bentham and Mill, this talk explores new methods for reshaping our understanding of science as a pursuit often impacted and guided by desire and aesthetic longing. With examples from the history of science and technology it will invite attendees to consider this approach as a philosophically and empirically supported method for effectively communicating science. We will also go into new comprehensive approaches to measuring psychological pleasure both quantitatively and qualitatively for impact reporting.

The author has not yet submitted a copy of the full paper.

Presentation type: Insight talk
Theme: Transformation

Author: Autumn Brown – Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland

What role should science communicators play in the movement towards knowledge and innovation based societies? Is it to summon up space where we might host and facilitate complex scientific, ethical, technological and philosophical discussions across communities and disciplines? Opportunities to engage with science in accessible and informal settings have become vital opportunities for those seeking to contribute to, and actively participate in the culture of science outside of school. How can we create environments which unsettle traditional power structures and encourage open discussion?

This presentation will explore real world examples in creating culturally relevant and engaging science learning opportunities through the use of art and purposeful dialogue. We will examine the function of visual art in shaping conversations at the local and national level when mediated by professional science communicators. The presentation will take a critical look at the role of the science communicator as guide, provocateur and fellow learner when exploring new and complex ideas in a non-formal learning environment.

Art has the potential to empower individuals and communities, and act as a powerful catalyst for change. Coupled with the praxis of learner/artefact mediation, it is a valuable instrument in the exploration of self, the affirming of identity, but also the expression and critique of complex ideas. Exploring the utility of this approach will give us as practitioners, and researchers fresh insights into the future of collaborative science and innovation.

The author has not yet submitted a copy of the full paper.

Presentation type: Visual presentation
Theme: Transformation