Author: Santiago Nicolas Canete

One of the steps towards closing the gap between science and society consist of involving the scientific community in meaningful interactions with society. In this respect, research measuring actual participation of scientists -key actors in public engagement- and their attitudes towards communicating with non-experts is still developing. This project used a qualitative approach to examine barriers, motivations, and other factors influencing researchers’ view of and participation in public engagement activities. In depth interviews were conducted with scientists who work at a science museum in the United States and who periodically present public talks to visitors, which allowed analyzing the perspective of active engagers. The study identified specific motivations, barriers and other factor’s affecting scientists’ involvement in public communication of science and technology. Results confirmed findings from prior research but also shed light on new elements that scientists consider regarding their participation in PE. For instance, findings from this study suggest that extrinsic factors have stronger influence in scientists’ willingness to participate and actual participation in PE than intrinsic factors. Barriers to PE were predominantly extrinsic, while motivations showed a balance between internal and external factors.

Author: Santiago Nicolas Canete

There have been many calls to the mobilization of scientists to engage meaningful interactions with non-experts, but research seeking to explain and predict participation in science communication is still developing. This project used an expanded version of the theory of planned behavior as a model to examine whether determined demographic, institutional and cognitive factors influence researchers’ intention to participate in public engagement with science activities, such as giving public talks, writing popular science articles or talking to young students in schools. Data from a stratified random sample of researchers at North Carolina State University (n=404) were collected and subsequently analyzed through hierarchical multiple regression. Findings indicate that there are six significant independent predictors of scientists’ intentions to engage with the public: past training, past participation, attitude, moral norm, managerial norm and role in a funded project. Based on these results, it is concluded that experience, liking, and accountability are the major factors influencing this type of behavior. Implications of these results for initiatives aiming at stimulating researchers’ participation in public communication are discussed and overall recommendations are provided.