Cardinal virtues and capital vices in science communication
How do we recognise “good” and “bad” science communication? The theme of quality has long been neglected in our field, as it has been the theme of values of science communication.
If you are not happy with the results below please do another search
How do we recognise “good” and “bad” science communication? The theme of quality has long been neglected in our field, as it has been the theme of values of science communication.
The panel will examine key ideas and trends in science communication studies as the field has developed during the last decade.
Since Hooke’s Micrographia (1665), modern science has put images at the center of its communicative processes: drawings, diagrams, schemes and later photographs, satellite images, film.
Over recent years, there has been much discussion of the status of science communication as a discipline, as a field of empirical research and theoretical reflection.